SharePoint hub sites

A hub site is an ordinary SharePoint site that an administrator has registered as a hub, so other sites can associate with it. Associated sites inherit the hub’s shared navigation and theme, roll their content up into the hub’s web parts, and join the hub’s search scope. Hubs are how modern SharePoint imposes structure on a deliberately flat estate: instead of nesting sites inside each other as subsites, you connect independent sites side by side and each keeps its own permissions, storage and ownership.

Part of the SharePoint reference · Limits verified against Microsoft documentation · Last reviewed 1 September 2026

What association actually inherits

This is the whole subject in one list, and getting it wrong is the source of most disappointment with hubs. Association gives you four things — and four things people commonly expect but do not get.

  • Shared navigationThe hub's navigation bar appears on every associated site.
  • ThemeThe hub's theme and logo propagate to associated sites.
  • Search scopeThe site joins the hub's search scope, so hub search covers it.
  • Content roll-upNews, Events, Sites and Highlighted content pull from the site when the source is set to all sites in the hub.
  • Permissions — not inheritedAssociation does not change permissions. Associate a restricted site and only people with access see its rolled-up content.
  • A place in the navigation — not automaticAssociating does not add the site to the hub menu. Hub owners choose what appears there.
  • Governance policies — not inheritedRetention labels, sensitivity classifications and sharing restrictions must still be set per site or per tenant.
  • A permissions hierarchy — does not existEvery associated site stays an independent site collection. Hubs are a navigation and search construct, not a parent-child tree.

Limits and thresholds

One of these figures is worth reading carefully, because published guidance disagrees with Microsoft.

SharePoint hub site limits Verified 1 Sep 2026
SharePoint hub site limits
Hard limits — enforced by the service
Hub sites per tenant 2,000
Associated sites per hub (per Microsoft) Unlimited
Hubs a single site can join 1
Can an associated site become a hub? No
Supported hub-to-hub nesting levels 1
Child links per navigation level 500
Sites web part, source “all sites in the hub” 99
Registration changes take effect within 2–4 hours
Practical guidance — exceed at a cost
Navigation links per level, recommended 100
Hubs for a 5,000-person organisation 8–15
Navigation depth 3 levels

Sources: Microsoft Learn, Register-SPOHubSite (2,000 hubs per tenant, unlimited associated sites, 2–4 hour propagation); Microsoft Learn, Planning your SharePoint hub sites; Microsoft Learn, Introduction to SharePoint information architecture (500 child links per level). Verified 1 September 2026. See the full SharePoint limits table for platform-wide figures.

A conflict worth knowing about Microsoft’s own PowerShell documentation describes associated sites per hub as unlimited. Several widely-read third-party guides state a cap of 1,000 or 2,000. We have not found that figure in current Microsoft documentation, so we quote Microsoft and flag the disagreement rather than pick a side. If you are approaching either number, test in a non-production tenant.

Nesting, and what does not cross the boundary

One level of hub-to-hub nesting is supported: a parent hub with child hubs, each holding its own associated sites. Deeper chains can be configured but behave unpredictably, particularly for roll-up web parts.

The constraint that catches architects out applies even to supported nesting. Hub-to-hub association extends the search scope, but web part roll-ups do not cross it. A News web part on the parent hub set to “all sites in the hub” returns posts from the parent hub’s own associated sites — not from sites hanging off the child hubs. If your information architecture assumes a single company-wide newsfeed aggregating up through a hub tree, it will not work that way.

The four common mistakes

  • A hub per team. Hubs represent major organisational groupings, not individual teams. Fifty hubs produces navigation nobody can follow; eight to fifteen usually serves a large organisation well.
  • Deciding hubs after associating. A site already associated with a hub cannot be converted into a hub. Choose which sites will be hubs first.
  • Deleting a hub without unregistering it. Associated sites are left with stale hub metadata, and their navigation and roll-ups break quietly rather than throwing an error.
  • No exit policy. Joining a hub can be gated with an approval flow. Leaving cannot. You need detection and remediation rather than prevention.

Key takeaways

  • 4 things only Association inherits navigation, theme, search scope and roll-up That is the complete list. Not permissions, not governance policies, and not a place in the hub menu — hub owners choose that separately.
  • 1 hub per site A site can only join one hub, ever, at a time The biggest constraint on hub architecture. A site serving two business units has to pick, and express the other relationship through navigation or search.
  • 8–15 not 50 The tenant limit of 2,000 is not a target A hub per team is the commonest mistake. Hubs should map to business units, functions or geographies.
  • 99 sites max The real ceiling is in the web parts, not the association Microsoft calls associated sites unlimited, but the Sites web part returns 99 and navigation caps at 500 links per level.
  • 1 level nesting Roll-ups do not cross a hub-to-hub relationship Nesting extends search but not content aggregation. A company-wide feed built on a hub tree will not collect posts from child hubs' sites.
  • 2–4h propagation Wait before you reconfigure Registration and permission changes take hours to appear. Reconfiguring mid-propagation is a reliable way to create a half-applied mess.

Hubs and how the intranet looks

A hub propagates a theme, which is not the same as propagating a design. Theme inheritance covers colours and logo. It does not make the associated sites look like they belong to the same intranet, because layout, typography, page structure and component treatment are all set per page by whoever built it.

The visible result on most estates is a hub whose navigation bar is consistent and whose twenty associated sites look like twenty different products. That is not a hub configuration problem and no amount of admin centre work fixes it.

Consistency below the navigation bar

ShortPoint is a no-code design layer for SharePoint. It does not change your hub architecture — it gives the associated sites a shared design language, so a hub reads as one intranet rather than a shared menu over twenty unrelated pages.

  • Reusable page layouts department owners apply without a developer
  • Full theming — fonts, spacing, component treatment — beyond colour and logo
  • Roll-ups presented as designed cards and searchable tables
  • Site templates so a new associated site starts consistent

Used on 350,000+ SharePoint sites by 12M+ people · Microsoft Solutions Partner · No credit card required

Common questions about hub sites

What is a SharePoint hub site?

How many hub sites can you have in SharePoint?

How many sites can be associated with one hub?

What does associating a site with a hub actually inherit?

Can a site belong to more than one hub?

Can you nest hub sites?

How long do hub site changes take to appear?

What is the difference between a hub site and a subsite?

Sources

Related reference

Nearby in the reference